------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 18:25 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm not sure the root cause of this bug is fixed in 4.1. It looks to me like > it's still there and is only (currently) hidden. Am I mistaken? > Apply this patch to gcc-4.1-20051029 and recompile the testcase with -O3. > I'm seeing an abort. If I set a breakpoint on integer_nonzerop and print the > boolean_true_node tree I see it's marked as "overflow". Oops
Overflow should mean nothing to the optimizers or expanders. It is only a language term really that should only matter to the front-end. integer_nonzerop should not be used that much any more, Yes I know it is but really it needs to be changed to use nonzero_p instead. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24599
