------- Comment #12 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 07:25 ------- The patch should use false instead of 0. These new fangled boolean types keep messing me up.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202
wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org Mon, 31 Oct 2005 23:25:06 -0800
------- Comment #12 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 07:25 ------- The patch should use false instead of 0. These new fangled boolean types keep messing me up.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202