------- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-30 22:55 ------- Leaving as P2; we should at least try to figure out whether we really want to give a warning here.
(I suspect we may end up closing this PR as INVALID, because the non-PODness does affect things -- like whether the value is passed by reference or not when calling a function. But, I haven't thought hard enough to say for sure.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17519
