------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-27 11:26 -------
Confirmed, in principle. Though, in this light, one needs to re-evaluate if
the branch cost of 1 is good for optimize_size. Same for x86_64, btw., which
should really get different size-cost table for 64bit.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
GCC target triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |i686-*-*
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-10-27 11:26:11
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24547
