------- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-10-27 09:07 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Naming wise I think __gnu_ext makes more sense. It's what we should have used > for the extension namespace from the beginning.
Of course I'm ok with __gnu_ext. Actually, I'm ok with anything you would rather prefer, __gnu_legacy was just an example, meant to make totally clear (for argumentation purposes too) that we are talking about legacy stuff, indeed. Anyway, when I will actually prepare a patch, it will move the old HP/SGI facilities to namespace __gnu_ext, agreed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24537
