------- Comment #3 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2005-10-25 11:26
-------
This patch appears to work very well, thanks!
However, later in my code I run into a problem of the following sort:
The (patched) compiler rejects the following code
void bar (int *p)
{
#pragma omp parallel for
for (int m=0; m<1000; ++m)
{
switch(p[m])
{
case 1:
p[m]=2;
break;
}
}
}
~/tmp>g++ -fopenmp -c test.cc
test.cc: In function 'void bar(int*)':
test.cc:10: error: break statement used with OpenMP for loop
Is this really ill-formed code? It is accepted by all other compilers I tested.
I can open another bug report for this, but I'd like to make sure first that
this is not a consequence of the proposed patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24513
