------- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-24 16:31
-------
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I think I've seen this bug reported somewhere, but couldn't find it in a
> > quick
> > search.
> Looks to be PR 23675.
Yes, they seem to be the same, except that PR 23675 demonstrates an other bug
as well, namely the same one as in PR 22607.
I confirm this bug, and mark it as blocking PR 23675, and will do the same with
PR 22607 (another possibility would be to mark both this and PR 22607 as
duplicates of PR 23675, but since they are separate bugs I think there is some
value in keeping them as separate PR:s)
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |23675
nThis| |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-10-24 16:31:43
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24503
