------- Comment #5 from rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 10:26 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > It would be nice if you could at least indicate what kind > of non-compliance you are talking of here. Is it strictfp, > accuracy of results, rounding of floating-point literals, > or something else? Of course, you should not reproduce > tests verbatim from the JCK, but please provide some > indication of what you're talking about in this bug report.
Sorry, I just noticed that aph was the one who changed the summary to lack of strictfp support. So I guess he knows what you were talking about in the bug report. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24454
