------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-15 04:08 -------
The only one which GCC is wrong with is the following
// t_.~S(); // 2.1 expected class-name before '('
token
Which is also recorded as PR 23287.
The rest are all correct with the current GCC. I am going to close this as
works for me.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
Summary| Explicit invocation of |Explicit invocation of
|constructors, destructors |constructors, destructors
|and conversion operators in |and conversion operators in
|template code |template code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24377
