------- Comment #22 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-11 17:05 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] C++ front-end does not "inline" the static const double
sabre at nondot dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #21 from sabre at nondot dot org 2005-10-11 17:03 ------- > "required optimization" doesn't make sense to me. To put it more clearly, do > you agree that this: > > "In particular, I think the C++ standard specifies that memory is zero > initialized and then ctors (within a translation unit) are run in order." > > statement is true, and that the code in comment 11 is valid? Initializers are not constructors. You'll have to go read the section of the standard I cited. The code in comment #11 is valid -- but it must print 3.0, which may not be what you expected. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21089
