------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-23
13:15 -------
Confirmed, this is a regression from 3.4.0 where we did not have this access.
It looks like it was caused by:
2005-02-09 Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* builtins.c (DEF_BUILTIN): Add COND argument.
* tree.h (DEF_BUILTIN): Likewise.
* builtins.def (DEF_GCC_BUILTIN, DEF_LIB_BUILTIN, DEF_EXT_LIB_BUILTIN,
DEF_C94_BUILTIN, DEF_C99_BUILTIN, DEF_C99_C90RES_BUILTIN): Update to
match.
(DEF_BUILTIN_STUB): New.
(BUILT_IN_STACK_SAVE, BUILT_IN_STACK_RESTORE, BUILT_IN_INIT_TRAMPOLINE,
BUILT_IN_ADJUST_TRAMPOLINE, BUILT_IN_NONLOCAL_GOTO,
BUILT_IN_PROFILE_FUNC_ENTER, BUILT_IN_PROFILE_FUNC_EXIT): Use it.
* c-common.c (DEF_BUILTIN): Add COND argument.
* tree.c (local_define_builtin): New.
(build_common_builtin_nodes): New.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-08-23 13:16:00
date| |
Summary|Bad array access in |[4.0/4.1 Regression] Bad
|DEF_GCC_BUILTIN |array access in
| |DEF_GCC_BUILTIN
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23506
