Hmm, this is both a VRP bug and a folding bug. Even though a is VARYING, we know the that a*a will always be postive (this with -fno-wrapv which is default for C, C++ and fortran). void link_error(void); void f(int a) { int b = a; b*=a; if (b < 0) link_error(); }
--- There should be no references to link_error(). There is another way of fixing this via the fold: void link_error(void); void f(int a) { if (a*a < 0) link_error(); } But that will miss: void link_error(void); void f(int a) { if (a*a*a*a*a*a < 0) link_error(); } --- Yes that is most likely to overflow but that is the whole point of -fno-wrapv. Also ICC does not do this optimization at all. -- Summary: a*a (for signed ints with -fno-wrapv) is always postive Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23471