------- Additional Comments From christopherbuell at mindspring dot com 2005-08-06 15:02 ------- (In reply to comment #3)
Got it. I don't know the F90 or F95 standard very well. I do know F77. The code I was porting did compile on the MS-DEC FORTRAN 95 compiler. (whoever owns that compiler anyway) It seems "reasonable" that it should work. But, I didn't know what the spec said. Thanx for getting back to me. Chris > gfortran is doing the right thing according to section 7.1.6.1 > of the Fortran 95 standard. For completeness, here is the output > of NAGWare F95 compiler. > kargl[204] f95 -kind=byte -c lk.f90 > Error: lk.f90, line 10: Invalid real part of complex constant > Error: lk.f90, line 11: Invalid real part of complex constant > Error: lk.f90, line 12: Invalid real part of complex constant > Error: lk.f90, line 13: Invalid real part of complex constant > Error: lk.f90, line 14: Invalid real part of complex constant > Errors in declarations, no further processing for CONSTS_TEST -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23254
