------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-02 22:19 ------- Subject: Re: alias analysis doesn't take into account that variables that haven't their address taken can't alias arbitrary MEMs
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 19:19 +0000, amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-02 > 19:19 ------- > (In reply to comment #20) > > > The improved aliasing was not reverted though which is what gets most of the > improvements and not > > the promote statics pass. > > The scheduling testcase still suffers from insufficient alias information. And it will until all of the info about what variables, etc, we have is kept through scheduling. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20367