------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20 05:27 ------- Thanks for the reduction; I see the problem clearly now. For the record,
b$real_193 = CR.53_187; b$imag_194 = CI.54_188; c$real_195 = b$real_193; c$imag_196 = b$imag_194; we had a ring of copies to perform, and they came out in the wrong order. I'll have to give this some thought... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22504
