------- Additional Comments From zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2005-07-18 11:53 ------- I am not a language lawyer (at least with respect to c) but it seems that the intent of the committee in n1111 was to limit when you were "looking at" a union,
Dr 257 seems to be only talking about what you are allowed to do if you are looking at a union. It seems to me that if you are not looking at a union, and this seems clearly where n1111 was going, that the subsequence rule could not be applied. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22534
