------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-14 
13:34 -------
Subject: Bug 16435

CVSROOT:        /cvs/gcc
Module name:    gcc
Branch:         gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]       2005-07-14 13:34:49

Modified files:
        libgfortran/io : io.h write.c read.c list_read.c transfer.c 
        libgfortran    : ChangeLog 
        gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77: f77-edit-x-out.f 
        gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
Added files:
        gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: tl_editing.f90 complex_read.f90 
                                   past_eor.f90 

Log message:
        2005-07-14 Paul Thomas  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        
        PR libfortran/16435
        * transfer.c (formatted_transfer): Correct the problems
        with X- and T-editting that caused TLs followed by TRs
        to overwrite data, which caused NIST FM908.FOR to fail
        on many tests.
        (data_transfer_init): Zero X- and T-editting counters at
        the start of formatted IO.
        * write.c (write_x): Write specified number of skips with
        specified number of spaces at the end.
        
        2005-07-14 Paul Thomas  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        
        * io/read.c (read_complex): Prevent X formatting during reads
        from going beyond EOR to fix NIST fm908.FOR failure.
        * io/list_read.c (read_complex): Allow complex data in list-
        directed reads to have eols either side of the comma to
        fix NIST FM906.FOR failure.
        (nml_get_obj_data): Cure warnings about initializer braces.
        (namelist_read):  Cure warnings about potentially uninitialized 
pointers.
        
        2005-07-14  Paul Thomas  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        
        PR libfortran/16435
        * gfortran.dg/tl_editting.f90: New.
        * gfortran.dg/g77/f77-edit-x-out.f: Remove XFAIL.
        
        2005-07-14  Paul Thomas  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        
        * gfortran.dg/past_eor.f90: New.
        * gfortran.dg/complex_read.f90: New.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/io.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.16.10.2&r2=1.16.10.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/write.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.23.2.8&r2=1.23.2.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/read.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.8.10.4&r2=1.8.10.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/list_read.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.14.2.3&r2=1.14.2.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/transfer.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.32.2.8&r2=1.32.2.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.163.2.59&r2=1.163.2.60
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/tl_editing.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.2.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/complex_read.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/past_eor.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/f77-edit-x-out.f.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.1&r2=1.1.48.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.5084.2.275&r2=1.5084.2.276



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16435

Reply via email to