[Bug middle-end/22347] Return value register not correctly computed for indirect function call

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-14 
07:46 -------
Subject: Bug 22347

CVSROOT:        /cvs/gcc
Module name:    gcc
Changes by:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]       2005-07-14 07:46:23

Modified files:
        gcc            : ChangeLog 
        gcc/config/i386: i386-protos.h i386.c i386.h 
Added files:
        gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386: sseregparm-3.c sseregparm-4.c 
                                       sseregparm-5.c sseregparm-6.c 
                                       sseregparm-7.c 

Log message:
        2005-07-14  Richard Guenther  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        
        PR middle-end/22347
        * config/i386/i386-protos.h (ix86_function_value): Change
        prototype to match new target hook.
        * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_value_regno): Change prototype
        to take extra type argument.
        (TARGET_FUNCTION_VALUE): Define.
        (ix86_function_ok_for_sibcall): Pass extra argument to
        ix86_value_regno, check return slot rtx for exact match.
        (ix86_function_value): Take extra parameter.  Dispatch to
        ix86_value_regno with fndecl/fntype as provided.
        (ix86_value_regno): Handle extra type argument.
        * config/i386/i386.h (FUNCTION_VALUE): No longer define.
        
        * testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sseregparm-3.c: New testcase.
        * testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sseregparm-4.c: New testcase.
        * testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sseregparm-5.c: New testcase.
        * testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sseregparm-6.c: New testcase.
        * testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sseregparm-7.c: New testcase.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.9442&r2=2.9443
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386-protos.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.143&r2=1.144
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.841&r2=1.842
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.440&r2=1.441
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sseregparm-3.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sseregparm-4.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sseregparm-5.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sseregparm-6.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sseregparm-7.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22347