------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 12:32 ------- Confirmed. Reduced testcase:
================================= struct A { A(void*); ~A(); }; void foo(const int i, bool b) { b ? A(0) : i; } ================================= Without "-pedantic" we get an ICE (since gcc 3.4.0) PR22434.cc: In function 'void foo(int, bool)': PR22434.cc:9: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:3765 Please submit a full bug report, [etc.] With -pedantic the code is rejected (since gcc 3.4.0). It was rejected unconditionally before gcc 3.4.0. The code is also rejected if one removes the const qualifier from "i". So maybe we should switch back to the original behavior? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-12 12:32:03 date| | Summary|ICE in |[3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] ICE |simplify_{,gen_}subreg |in simplify_{,gen_}subreg Target Milestone|--- |3.4.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22434