------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 11:09 ------- ...to end this pointless discussion.
Some people call this a bug in the x87 series. Other call it a bug in gcc. See these mails at least for the reason why this could be considered a bug in gcc: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-08/msg01195.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-08/msg01234.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-08/msg01257.html Regardless of where one wishes to put the blame, this problem will _not_ be fixed. Period. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |SUSPENDED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
