------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 14:28 ------- http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2003/n1520.pdf
Hmm, this is not valid C++89 but looks like it will become valid code in the newer C++ standard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22047
