------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-03 22:27
-------
In private mail, I got another testcase that is even weirder:
---------------------------
struct O {
template<typename T> struct B {
void set (T, bool=true);
};
struct D : public B<int> {};
};
void x ()
{
O::B<int> d;
d.set(1);
}
----------------------------
Note that now we allocate an object of type O::B<int>, and get the same
error as before. The type O::D isn't used anywhere; however, if we comment
out the line in which it is declared, the test suddenly starts to compile.
What does confuse me, to be honest, is that icc shows the same behavior...
Nathan, Giovanni?
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21903
