------- Additional Comments From oliverst at online dot de 2005-05-31 01:29 ------- Yes, I did expect a different warning, because
int i = i; would be uninitialized use and self initialization. And because of an special warnings flag I expected it to be different from the uninitialized use warning. But if it causes the same, it should be part of -Wuninitialized and -Winit-self would be kind of redundant then. Maybe I am just seeing this totally wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19761
