------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-22
21:10 -------
Subject: Re: missed optimization due with
const function and pulling out of loops
> .
>
> Nevertheless, even if we are very strict with the definition, moving
> get_type2 out of the loop is not a good idea, since get_type2 might
> potentially be very expensive (and we have no way how to determine
> that this is not the case), thus we would lose in case get_type2
> should be never executed.
>
>
Don't we attempt to detect zero trip loops?
(If not, we should :P)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21712
