------- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2005-05-21 18:10 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > This is undefined, see the full discussion on the gcc list: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-05/msg00073.html > > - out of curiosity, it's not clear that the discussion reached any > conclusion which enables GCC to disreguard the type semantics > as specifed by the program code. Where in the standard does it > specify that a type qualifier may be disreguarded if convenient?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-05/msg00085.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21568
