------- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-05-20 08:58 ------- (In reply to comment #54) > Subject: Re: libstdc++ headers should have pop/push > of the visibility around the declarations > > bernie at develer dot com wrote: > > > It's not a regresion, but it causes KDE to miscompile > > with GCC 4.0.0. Could we apply it for 4.0 anyway? > > No; we confine ourselves to regressions. If it wasn't a regression, > there must be some workaround that KDE is using for previous releases > that it can continue to use here. kde-core team already blacklisted gcc-4.0.0 due to detected bugs. they'll probably do the same thing with incoming 4.0.x releases due to gcc's rules which block major bugfixes != regression fixes. there is no logic reason for making workarounds for valid c++ code and releasing buggy 4.0.x branch.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664
