------- Additional Comments From mrd at alkemio dot org 2005-05-17 00:33 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Did you read comment #1.
Yes, but it's not clear. > GCC doesn't know what constitutes a reference to a volatile memory Is this to say the GCC developers believe the C language's definition of "volatile" is ambiguous, or that there are situations where "incl x" is operationally distinct from "movl x, %eax; incl %eax; movl %eax, x" when x is volatile? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506
