------- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-11 14:38 ------- I think the first line could be made clearer: '<anonymous enum>' is/uses anonymous type I'm reading it again and again, and it doesn't make sense to me.
Then the second line refers to an operator<< most probably defined in some remote header file. This is distracting. I would suggest not printing this second line at all. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21514
