------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-09 00:20 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Reload may generate stores to read-only memory
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-07 > 16:52 ------- > >>I don't know that I'm in a position to make a good decision here, but I >>do agree with Jeff -- it would be a lot more compelling to make the >>change if there was actually a demonstrable problem -- especially coming >>from non-synthetic code. > > > I presume you'd like to have a testcase that fails with 4.0.x? Because I can > hardly think of a more demonstrable problem than this one: Jeff's analysis for > 4.1.x was exactly the same as mine for 3.3.x and nothing has changed in the > code. Yes, a 4.0 testcase was what I had in mind. If you don't think it's easy to come up with one, but you are sure that people are likely to run into this bug, let me know. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15248
