------- Additional Comments From benh at bwsint dot com 2005-05-06 16:04 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > The first error message is also odd; "non-lvalue" is C terminology that is > > rarely used in relation to C++. > > That is wrong because the standard actually uses lvalue and rvalue all the > time.
Right, and it uses "rvalue" rather than "non-lvalue". So far as I can see, all rvalues of user-defined type are temporaries, so there would be no loss of precision in changing "temporary" to "rvalue" as well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21386
