------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 13:53 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 4.4 : 'Unlike explicit initialization, default initialization does not imply > that the object has the SAVE attribute'
So? I still don't see why this is invalid. The error message FX quoted still doesn't make any more sense to me. What am I missing? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20845
