------- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 02:47 ------- Subject: Re: [PR c++/21087] don't keep builtin anticipated decl, override it with actual declaration
On Apr 21, 2005, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> When push_overloaded_decl() was passed a new declaration that matches >> a builtin decl, it would verify that the declarations matched and, if >> so, leave the existing (built-in) declaration alone. >> The intended behavior is to merge the built-in declaration with the >> new declaration, into the location of the built-in declaration. >> The problem is that duplicate_decl() doesn't perform such merging >> when >> the new declaration is a template decl, and then we end up with an >> overload involving the template decl and the anticipated built-in >> decl. However, overloads involving anticipated decls are something we >> try to avoid, and actually check for elsewhere. >> This patch fixes the code such that, if the existing decl is >> anticipated and the two decls weren't merged, we discard the built-in >> and use the new decl by itself. >> Bootstrapped and regtested on amd64-linux-gnu. Ok to install? > OK. Ok for 4.0 branch as well? The same patch applies cleanly there, and it's just completed bootstrap and regtesting on amd64-linux-gnu in the branch as well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21087
