------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-20 03:58 ------- Because there is nothing to instantiate at that time or at least this is IIRC, I think before 4.0, gcc was wrong in which case this is a progression rather than a regression. I don't have the standard in front of me right now to confirm this and I am very tired.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21118
