------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-04-18 19:29
-------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Simple code which shows we now have a missed optimization:
> static const double a = 1.0;
> static const double b = a+1.0;
>
> double c()
> {
> return b;
> }
>
> See PR 21089.
I believe the optimization necessitates the variable's declaration be changed
(either explicitly, or by implication):
static const double b = a+1.0; => const double b = a+1.0;
If it's static-const value can't be pre-computed at compile time. (as opposed
to allowing a non-const-literal value to initialize a global static const
object).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20912
