------- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 02:37 ------- Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Apr 16, 2005, Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this clear things up? Do you agree? Yup, for both questions. Thanks for the clarification. It wasn't clear to me that the assignments played any useful role, as soon as I found out the givs could be assumed to hold the correct value. It all makes sense to me now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20126
