------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-14
00:36 -------
Janis said she would take care of them:
[17:22] < rth> janis: ping
[17:22] < janis> rth: pong
[17:23] < rth> janis: why is gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-2.c being tested on i386
even though
vect_condition is only true for ppc?
[17:23] < janis> rth: no idea, I'll take a look
[17:24] < rth> janis: i assume devang did something wrong, but i can't see what.
[17:30] < janis> rth: you mean the test on the autovect branch? it's run for
all targets, the options are
overridden for powerpc, and the scan-tree-dump-times check is expected to fail
on x86 and on
x86_64
[17:36] < rth> janis: on, i mean on mainline.
[17:36] < janis> I didn't see that test on mainline, is it new today?
[17:37] < rth> janis: within the last day or three.
[17:40] < janis> rth: dg-do needs to come before directives that are local to
the gcc testsuite
[17:41] < janis> rth: I'll fix those
[17:41] < rth> janis: thanks.
[17:41] < janis> np
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-04-14 00:36:40
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21010
