------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-04 23:01 ------- Subject: Re: [Committed] PR c++/19199: Preserve COND_EXPR lvalueness in fold
Alexandre Oliva wrote: > If you find that reviewing patch proposals is wasting your time, I'm > sorry. Of course, untested patches should be clearly marked as such, which yours always are. Given that, I don't feel like you're wasting my time with such a posting; if I see something obviously disconcerting I can comment. However, I do find that I'm less interested in reviewing such patches. So, from my point of view, I'd prefer that you post most patches after a full test cycle. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19199
