------- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-04-02 
16:59 -------
Subject: Re: [PR tree-optimization/20640] add phi args to dests of 
dce-redirected edges

On Mar 31, 2005, Jeffrey A Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 05:26 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Mar 31, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ ... ]
>> Anyway, how does this patch look?
>> Index: gcc/ChangeLog
> from  Alexandre Oliva  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>         PR tree-optimization/20640
>         * tree-ssa-dce.c (remove_dead_stmt): Don't redirect edge to
>         post-dominator if it has phi nodes.
>         (eliminate_unnecessary_stmts): Remove dead phis in all blocks
>         before dead statements.
> BTW, if you want to go forward with this version, it looks OK to me
> assuming it passes bootstrapping and regression testing.

It does, so I'm checking it in with a minor change: it doesn't make
sense to request the edge to be redirected to itself, since it's a
no-op, so I moved the call into the `else' branch of the new
conditional.

Thanks,

Index: gcc/ChangeLog
from  Alexandre Oliva  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        PR tree-optimization/20640
        * tree-ssa-dce.c (remove_dead_stmt): Don't redirect edge to
        post-dominator if it has phi nodes.
        (eliminate_unnecessary_stmts): Remove dead phis in all blocks
        before dead statements.

Index: gcc/tree-ssa-dce.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.c,v
retrieving revision 2.37
diff -u -p -r2.37 tree-ssa-dce.c
--- gcc/tree-ssa-dce.c 12 Mar 2005 20:53:18 -0000 2.37
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-dce.c 1 Apr 2005 20:30:24 -0000
@@ -637,7 +637,10 @@ eliminate_unnecessary_stmts (void)
     {
       /* Remove dead PHI nodes.  */
       remove_dead_phis (bb);
+    }
 
+  FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
+    {
       /* Remove dead statements.  */
       for (i = bsi_start (bb); ! bsi_end_p (i) ; )
        {
@@ -724,6 +727,7 @@ remove_dead_stmt (block_stmt_iterator *i
   if (is_ctrl_stmt (t))
     {
       basic_block post_dom_bb;
+
       /* The post dominance info has to be up-to-date.  */
       gcc_assert (dom_computed[CDI_POST_DOMINATORS] == DOM_OK);
       /* Get the immediate post dominator of bb.  */
@@ -737,9 +741,20 @@ remove_dead_stmt (block_stmt_iterator *i
          return;
        }
 
-      /* Redirect the first edge out of BB to reach POST_DOM_BB.  */
-      redirect_edge_and_branch (EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0), post_dom_bb);
-      PENDING_STMT (EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0)) = NULL;
+      /* If the post dominator block has PHI nodes, we might be unable
+        to compute the right PHI args for them.  Since the control
+        statement is unnecessary, all edges can be regarded as
+        equivalent, but we have to get rid of the condition, since it
+        might reference a variable that was determined to be
+        unnecessary and thus removed.  */
+      if (phi_nodes (post_dom_bb))
+       post_dom_bb = EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0)->dest;
+      else
+       {
+         /* Redirect the first edge out of BB to reach POST_DOM_BB.  */
+         redirect_edge_and_branch (EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0), post_dom_bb);
+         PENDING_STMT (EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0)) = NULL;
+       }
       EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0)->probability = REG_BR_PROB_BASE;
       EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0)->count = bb->count;
 
Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
from  Alexandre Oliva  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        PR tree-optimization/20640
        * gcc.dg/torture/tree-loop-1.c: New.

Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/tree-loop-1.c
===================================================================
RCS file: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/tree-loop-1.c
diff -N gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/tree-loop-1.c
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/tree-loop-1.c 30 Mar 2005 05:28:22 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/20640 */
+
+/* After unrolling the loop, we'd turn some conditional branches into
+   unconditional ones, but branch redirection would fail to compute
+   the PHI args for the PHI nodes in the replacement edge
+   destination, so they'd remain NULL causing crashes later on.  */
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+static int a = 0;
+extern int foo (void);
+extern int *bar (void) __attribute__ ((__const__));
+
+void
+test (int x)
+{
+  int b = 10;
+  while (foo () == -1 && *bar () == 4 && b > 0)
+    --b;
+  a = x;
+}

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org}


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20640

Reply via email to