since in case where you are doing "float **q=(float **)&i" then according to strict-aliasing rules we get " warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules" , but same thing if done using a temporary variable then why strict-aliasing warning doesn't appear.. According to my understanding of strict aliasing if some unqualified version of pointer is pointing to the address space then it is violating strict aliasing rule. So in second case also float ** pointer is pointing to the int address space then why strict aliasing rules are not violated. If ther is some error in my understanding of strict aliasing then please inform .
.the exact programs are following and command line was gcc -Wall -O2 test1.c test2.c....In this why test1.c not giving warning but test2.c giving violation of strict-aliasing warning. //test1.c #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main() { int *i; float **q; int **r; i =(int *)malloc(sizeof(int)); r=&i; q=(float **)r; return 0; } //test2.c int main(){ int *i; float **q; i =(int *)malloc(sizeof(int)); q= (float **) &i; return 0; } -- Summary: strict aliasing warning with float pointer pointing to int pointer Product: gcc Version: 3.3.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: varun0005 at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20709