------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29 21:11 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Re comment #5: I don't get the messages reported by Andrew, and I really > rather > doubt that those messages (form a different compiler version than I'm using) > are > legit. They are flagging stuff inside a stock "boost" library, and I have some > confidence that boost stuff is OK. Looks to me that whatever the bug is it > causes the compiler to start complaining at a random point in the source - > with > my 3.4.0 the complaint is in my own code, with Andrew's it's in a boost > library, > but both complaints are bogus.
The error messages are correct as far as I know. I am using the mainline (as of a couple of days ago). The error in Boost I think are fixed in a newer version of Boost. I will try to reduce this later tonight, it just will take me a while because I have to remove all the invalid code. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682
