This was hard to find. Consider this snippet:
------------------
struct B {
void f();
};
struct D : B {
using B::f;
B::f;
};
------------------
Note that D contains old- and new-style using declarations. In my case, they
were several hundred lines apart in D, so it wasn't quite so obvious. What
I get is this:
g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-4*/bin/c++ -c a.cc
a.cc:2: error: ?void B::f()? and ?void B::f()? cannot be overloaded
Note that it doesn't show where the attempt to overload happens, it only shows
the original place. That's bad diagnostics.
gcc2.95 didn't say anything about the code, so I rate this as a regression.
W.
--
Summary: [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Confusing message with
different using declarations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bangerth at dealii dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20637
