------- Additional Comments From kst at mib dot org 2005-03-24 22:50 ------- > the correct way is: > -std=iso9899:1990
Sure, but as long as "-std=c89" is supported, why not support "-std=c90" as well? It's more correct than "c89", and it's easier to remember than "iso9899:1990". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20631
