------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-18 21:42 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Why do you think movzbl is not an instruction on i386?
Just one more nore, movzbl is the same as movzx. This is where AT&T vs Intel
asm format is different.
So this is not a bug.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20540
