------- Additional Comments From mustafa at il dot ibm dot com 2005-03-16 09:36 ------- I suppose that the REG_DEAD for 136 in insn 65 is correct, because the next insn is a DEF of 136. So the problem here is that 136 is not in the liveout of BB 7. I can guess that insn 97 that defines 136 is added by SMS, but isn't it the job of update_flow_info to update the liveout of BB 7? At least that what I was excepting when called it from rest_of_handle_sms.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20177
