------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2005-03-07 15:04 
-------
> I'll try this evening.

Excellent. Probably, we want this change, irrespective of the improvements 
related
to Roger's work. However, probably this means that, for consistency, also the
other overloads of complex::pow must be tweaked a bit...

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20352

Reply via email to