------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-07
09:54 -------
An interesting thing in the head comment of unsafe_for_reeval in 3.4.x:
This assumes that CALL_EXPRs and TARGET_EXPRs are never replicated in
an expression tree, so that it safe to unsave them and the surrounding
context will be correct.
This assumption is violated by the C++ FE. On the other hand, unsafe_for_reeval
is gone in 4.0 so I'm not sure we really care at this point.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17972
