------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-07 04:19 ------- Subject: Re: [PR c++/19199] don't turn cond_expr lvalue into min_expr rvalue (continued from PR c++/20280)
Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Mar 5, 2005, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Roger has objected to this change in the past. As I noted in the >>audit trail for 19199, there's stuff in build_modify_expr to handle >>MIN_EXPR/MAX_EXPR as lvalues > > > Problem is, with the transformation performed by fold, it's no longer > an lvalue, and forcing it back into an lvalue just because it looks > like it should be one could break other programs. Yes, I understand. You still need to take it up with Roger, though. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19199
