Consider the following test program (fortran 90)
program explore
implicit none
integer, parameter :: NX = 32, NR = 16, NPHI=2
real :: input(0:NX-1, 0:NR-1, 0:NPHI-1)
write(*,*) size(input)
call random_number(input)
write(*,*) input
end program explore
This program compiles fine. It executes fine. But when the output is redirected
to a file, it produces the following error.
$gfortran explore.f90
$./a.out > temp
At line 11 of file explore.f90
Fortran runtime error: End of record
system & build information:
$gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f95,objc,ada--prefix=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --enable-threads=posix
--without-included-gettext --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit
--enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-mpfr --enable-java-gc=boehm
--enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-checking=release
i486-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.0 20050227 (experimental)
$gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f95,objc,ada
--prefix=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls
--enable-threads=posix --without-included-gettext --disable-werror
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-mpfr --enable-java-gc=boehm
--enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-checking=release
i486-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.0 20050227 (experimental)
$uname -a
Linux kusumanchi 2.6.9-1-686 #1 Thu Nov 25 03:48:29 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Other information:
System is Debian unstable (sid).
--
Summary: Fortran runtime error: End of record occurs when writing
large arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20257
