------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-02-08 19:07 ------- Subject: Re: __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Shouldn't the warning killer for system header errors apply to this sort of > thing? Apparently it doesn't. The problem is that macros are defined in system headers and expanded outside them. Getting the system header treatment to apply to macros defined in system headers so that #define _Complex_I 1.0iF or #define INTMAX_C(c) c ## LL can be defined in system headers, and then expanded in user source files without -pedantic diagnostics, would suffice. (Both cases are relevant, the former for <complex.h>, the latter for <stdint.h> if used in C90 mode.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263
