------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-07 20:17 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > Really TREE_OVERFLOW/TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW should go away, there has been > some talk about > removing them. on the tree level, having that flag set we really say the > constant is no longer be able to > prograte which causes the real problem.
Note I am talking about: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/ "Similarly, it should also be possible to get rid of at least one of TREE_OVERFLOW and TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW, which also describe what are essentially front-end properties." -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19788
